The practical answer
Every US chemical import needs either a TSCA positive certification (the substances comply with TSCA rules) or a negative certification (they are not subject to TSCA), signed by the importer or its agent before release. EPA says this applies to substances intended for research too. TSCA excludes drugs only when made or distributed for use as a drug, and 40 CFR 720.36 exempts small R&D quantities from premanufacture notice if its conditions are met.
Evidence, method & source dates ↓Why the broker is asking
A laboratory importing a peptide into the United States may get an unexpected question from its customs broker: positive or negative TSCA certification? The question comes from section 13 of the Toxic Substances Control Act and the Customs rule at 19 CFR 12.121. A certification must be signed and filed with CBP by the importer or an authorized agent of the importer, electronically through ACE or in writing, and paper statements must reach the port director before the shipment is released. [1] [2]
EPA states that certification is required for imported substances received by mail or commercial carrier, including those intended for research and development. [1] A small research order is therefore not outside the question just because it is small. This guide explains the two statements, the exclusions that decide between them, and the R&D exemption that often matters for research substances. It is not legal advice, and the importer, not the broker, signs the statement.
Positive and negative certification
19 CFR 12.121 sets out the wording. The certification must include the certifier's name, telephone number and email address. [2] EPA lists the rules a positive certification covers: section 5 premanufacture notice and significant new use rules, section 5(e) and 5(f) orders, section 6 rules, section 7 judicial actions and Title IV. It says section 4 and 8 rules do not affect import certification because they are not tied to individual shipments. [1]
| Statement | Wording (19 CFR 12.121) | When EPA says it is used |
|---|---|---|
| Positive | "I certify that all chemical substances in this shipment comply with all applicable rules or orders under TSCA and that I am not offering a chemical substance for entry in violation of TSCA or any applicable rule or order thereunder." [2] | The shipment is subject to TSCA and complies [1] |
| Negative | "I certify that all chemicals in this shipment are not subject to TSCA." [2] | The shipment is not subject to TSCA, for example drugs, pesticides or devices that are not clearly identified as such [1] |
| None | Not required [1] | Chemicals that are part of articles, unless a specific rule requires it; tobacco and tobacco products [1] |
When a peptide is outside TSCA
TSCA's definition of chemical substance, at 15 U.S.C. 2602(2), excludes several categories. The one that matters for peptides is (B)(vi): any food, food additive, drug, cosmetic or device as defined in section 201 of the FD&C Act, "when manufactured, processed, or distributed in commerce for use as" one of those things. [3]
The exclusion is tied to intended use, not to the molecule. A peptide imported as a drug product is regulated by FDA, and EPA lists FDA-regulated products among those that take a negative certification when not clearly identified. [1] A peptide bought as a laboratory reagent with no drug use is not obviously within that exclusion on the statute's wording. Which statement is accurate depends on facts the importer knows, so it should be decided by your institution's compliance or EHS office, not by the supplier's catalog wording.
The R&D exemption in 40 CFR 720.36
Part 720 is EPA's premanufacture notice rule. "Manufacture" in that part means to produce in the United States or import into the customs territory, so an importer is a manufacturer for these purposes. [5] Section 720.36 says the part does not apply to a substance that meets three conditions. [4]
| Condition | What the rule says | Record to keep |
|---|---|---|
| Small quantities | Made or imported only in small quantities solely for R&D, meaning amounts not greater than reasonably necessary for that purpose [4] [5] | Order quantities tied to a written research plan |
| Risk notification | Employees and recipients who work with it are told of health risks identified by the manufacturer's review, by labels, posted notices, written notice or another adequate method [4] | The SDS and label, and how they were circulated |
| Supervision | Used by or under the direct supervision of a technically qualified individual, someone capable of understanding the substance's health and environmental risks [4] [5] | Name of the responsible scientist |
| Distribution outside your organisation | Written notice that the substance is for R&D use only, with the health-risk notice [4] | Copy of the notice sent with any transfer |
| Commercial use | The exemption is lost if any amount is used commercially for anything other than R&D, with narrow exceptions [4] | Inventory log showing use and disposal |
The laboratory shortcut and leftovers
720.36(b)(2) removes the formal risk review where work is done solely in a laboratory, exposure is controlled by prudent laboratory practices for handling chemicals of unknown toxicity, and the substance is distributed only to other such laboratories, other than for disposal. A laboratory here means a contained research facility using relatively small quantities on a non-production basis. [4]
Leftover quantities may be disposed of as waste under applicable federal, state and local rules. [4] That ties the R&D exemption to your disposal records: a closed inventory entry with a waste pickup reference is evidence that the material stayed within research use.
Section 720.36 itself contains no separate recordkeeping clause and no import-specific provisions in the text we read, so the exemption does not replace the section 13 certification at entry. [4] [1]
Worksheet before you answer the broker
Work through these points with your compliance office and keep the answers with the purchase file. If you remain unsure, EPA's import-export page links to a contact form for TSCA import questions. [1]
- What exactly is in the shipment: substance name, CAS number if assigned, salt form, and whether it is a single substance or a mixture.
- Intended use: laboratory research only, with no drug, food, cosmetic or device use. Write it on the purchase order.
- Whether the substance is distributed for use as a drug and therefore excluded under 15 U.S.C. 2602(2)(B)(vi). [3]
- If subject to TSCA, whether it is on the Inventory or relies on the R&D exemption, and who the technically qualified individual is. [4] [5]
- Who signs: the importer or an authorized agent, with name, phone and email on the certification. [2]
- Where the signed statement and broker entry papers are filed, so a later EPA or CBP question can be answered from the record.
Questions before you decide
Does a small research import need a TSCA certification?
Yes. EPA states that certification is required for imported substances received by mail or commercial carrier, including those intended for research and development.
Is a peptide always outside TSCA because some peptides are drugs?
No. 15 U.S.C. 2602(2)(B)(vi) excludes a substance only when it is manufactured, processed or distributed in commerce for use as a drug or other FD&C Act product.
Who signs the TSCA import certification?
19 CFR 12.121 says the importer or the importer's authorized agent certifies, with the certifier's name, telephone number and email address, before release.
Does the R&D exemption remove the need for a certification?
No. 40 CFR 720.36 exempts qualifying R&D substances from the premanufacture notice rule; it contains no import provision, and EPA still requires section 13 certification.
Check the underlying evidence
Sources & review dates
- US EPA: TSCA Requirements for Importing Chemicals ↗Accessed 30 Oct 2026
- Cornell LII: 19 CFR 12.121, Procedures for chemical substances, mixtures and articles (TSCA certification) ↗Accessed 30 Oct 2026
- Cornell LII: 15 U.S.C. 2602, TSCA definitions ↗Accessed 30 Oct 2026
- Cornell LII: 40 CFR 720.36, Exemption for research and development ↗Accessed 30 Oct 2026
- Cornell LII: 40 CFR 720.3, Definitions ↗Accessed 30 Oct 2026
Sources are documentary evidence. They do not establish firsthand testing of a listed supplier.